[IPFire Artwork] Design Request | Captive Portal

Maurice Gesswein zerpixelung at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 08:53:59 CET 2016


Good morning,
I use lorem ipsum than. Thanks.
Am 31.01.2016 4:31 vorm. schrieb "Michael Tremer" <michael.tremer at ipfire.org
>:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 22:06 +0100, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
> > Can someone send me the terms & condition text from the screenshots
> > as real text?
>
> There is a text area where the user will type in the T&Cs. So there is
> no predefined text and it might change.
>
> Do you still want some sample or can you just use lorem ipsum?
>
> -Michael
>
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer at ipfir
> > e.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 20:37 +0100, Alexander Marx wrote:
> > > > > Hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, in general I got it. Thanks for the screens Alex.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a few questions and suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > > > To be prepared for further upcoming pages like these, are you
> > > able
> > > > > to hand over a list of them (perhaps with screenshots)? Not
> > > really
> > > > > needed, but very helpful to deliver a consistent flexible
> > > design.
> > >
> > > Don't worry about them too much.
> > >
> > > > As far as i know there are no other "external" pages. The
> > > > Webinterface of IPFire has an own design and several themes, i
> > > think
> > > > you already saw them.
> > >
> > > However, there are a few. I included both of them in the first
> > > email.
> > > On top of that there are the squid error pages. I am not too sure
> > > if we
> > > can modify those quite nicely.
> > >
> > > I will figure that out and get back to you.
> > >
> > > > > Should the hoster be able to include his own logo/brand? That
> > > would
> > > > > give the users a lot more trust in that things. If an image
> > > upload
> > > > > is not in the current scope, I suggest a prominent headline
> > > where
> > > > > the hoster is able to include the company name. Do you agree?
> > >
> > > > Actually the hoster is able to change the Title (The top-title in
> > > the
> > > > screenies like "Login" or on the other page "My private HotSpot")
> > > > maybe we can add a Logo but we have to decide which dimensions
> > > are
> > > > allowed. This is difficult as many companies have different
> > > > dimensions of Logos. Some are 4:3, others are like 27:9 and so
> > > on.
> > > > What do other people think?
> > >
> > > I think we don't need that. We usually have the opportunity to
> > > upload
> > > an entire HTML template, so that if someone wants to replace the
> > > page,
> > > they can do that. But just a logo is a bit too easy. Who ever wants
> > > to
> > > brand this as their own should do that with the rest, too.
> > >
> > > And of course we should not forget about doing some advertisement
> > > for
> > > our own product :) However, I get many emails from annoyed students
> > > that can't access dirty websites in their school. LOL
> > >
> > > > > Since it's part of IPFire, should those pages be designed like
> > > the
> > > > > new upcoming style of IPFire? Means same color theme, button
> > > style,
> > > > > IPFire logo, caption like "powered by IPFire", etc? Or should
> > > it
> > > > > totally generic so that the users has no clue what system shows
> > > > > those dialogs?
> > >
> > > I would like a "powered by IPFire" at least and even advise people
> > > who
> > > replace the theme by their own to keep that in.
> > >
> > > This does not need to be like the new stuff but I think it should
> > > feel
> > > a bit like IPFire but also be neutral. We do not need to hide that
> > > this
> > > is an IPFire system though.
> > >
> > > > No. I think if we have something like a "background-color"
> > > instead of
> > > > a picture, we should the hoster let configure it, so the people
> > > are
> > > > able to adpat the colors to their own corporate identity. So if
> > > you
> > > > woul like to work with gradients or similar, i would recommend to
> > > > make it configurable.
> > >
> > > Nah, not too many options. We wanted to keep this simple.
> > >
> > > > Michael, what do you think?
> > >
> > > See above :)
> > >
> > > -Michael
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best, Maurice
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Alexander Marx <alexander.marx
> > > @oab
> > > > > .de> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here are the actual ugly screenshots from the loginpage.
> > > > > > one version with voucher access and the other one with
> > > license
> > > > > > agreement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 29.01.2016 um 02:59 schrieb Michael Tremer:
> > > > > > >  Hi Maurice,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know that you are busy with other things, but
> > > nevertheless I
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > like to send you this request.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alex is currently working on a so called captive portal.
> > > That
> > > > > > > are these
> > > > > > > things that pop up on your phone or laptop when you connect
> > > to
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > wireless network in a hotel or cafe. That web page that is
> > > > > > > shown is
> > > > > > > what we need to design now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We also have a few other pages that are shown to the users
> > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > network when for example a web page is blocked. That page
> > > > > > > however is
> > > > > > > really ugly and probably needs a remake as well. I want to
> > > > > > > focus on the
> > > > > > > captive portal for now, but I guess you would like to know
> > > that
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > are more. [1] and [2]. Really bad right? They scare users.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alex will send you a screenshot of the development version
> > > we
> > > > > > > have now.
> > > > > > > This is just a quick page to show the concept and what we
> > > are
> > > > > > > roughly
> > > > > > > after.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are two options for now. The first one is where the
> > > user
> > > > > > > has to
> > > > > > > agree to a license and click a "I accept" button. The
> > > second
> > > > > > > one is
> > > > > > > where the user will have to type in a voucher code and
> > > click a
> > > > > > > button
> > > > > > > to log in.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Would you like to work on this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If so, a quick mock-up would be okay for now, because we
> > > would
> > > > > > > like to
> > > > > > > put this entire project on the wishlist to raise some
> > > crowd-
> > > > > > > funding
> > > > > > > money. Giving the user that mock-up would certainly help so
> > > > > > > that they
> > > > > > > get a good impression what they are supporting here. The
> > > actual
> > > > > > > implementation will happen a bit later when enough funds
> > > have
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > raised.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Alex, would you please send some screenshots of the two
> > > pages
> > > > > > > we have
> > > > > > > so far?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > -Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > P.S. @Maurice, I know that I am throwing a bit of random
> > > stuff
> > > > > > > at you.
> > > > > > > Just let me know when I don't make sense any more :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9sw4wUeUsgQ/VfU-c33FMDI/AAAAA
> > > AAAD
> > > > > > > zM/bBnJN4oCffo/s640/31.png
> > > > > > > [2] http://wiki.ipfire.org/_media/en/addons/clamav/squidcla
> > > mav-
> > > > > > > detection.png
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/ipfire-artwork/attachments/20160131/f510fa13/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the IPFire-Artwork mailing list