[IPFire Artwork] Website

Daniel Weismüller daniel.weismueller at ipfire.org
Fri Jun 23 15:33:33 CEST 2017


Hi again,

today I logged in to our Zeplin project and as I said already the things 
which are done looks very promising.

Is there something I could help or any open questions please tell me!

Maybe we could meet us in a telephone conference to talk directly about it.


yours

Daniel


Am 21.04.2017 um 12:58 schrieb Daniel Weismüller:
>
> Hi,
>
> I hope that all spent Easter well. :-)
>
> I really like your work and it heads forward.
>
> Finally all of us are now equiped with an ipfire account so everyone 
> may use  their public folder to share files and informations.
> Of course I don't want to prescribe which tool you have to use but for 
> most things we have already our own tools which all of us are able to use.
>
> So we don't need to use 3rd party products like dropbox.
>
> If there is a question about it or something else please feel free to ask.
>
> -
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> Am 17.04.2017 um 13:26 schrieb Maurice Gesswein:
>> Sorry for my late reply. I copied the Captive Portal stuff inside the 
>> shared Dropbox IPFire-Share folder. Here is the link again: 
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1j3p4f3igjxk2u8/AAAmebh2c1ay1t-z4UKrsWBAa?dl=0 
>>
>>
>> Please use the Pattern Lib of the Website (at Zeplin) for the Captive 
>> Portal. Yes, the old StyleGuide for Captive Portal is available as 
>> well. But please use the Pattern Lib (which is located at Zeplin) as 
>> the *primary* guidelines.
>>
>> Let me know if there are any questions.
>>
>> Best,
>> Maurice
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Michael Tremer 
>> <michael.tremer at ipfire.org <mailto:michael.tremer at ipfire.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 16:10 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     > I'll check out bugzilla and add the open issues there. I used
>>     bugzilla ages
>>     > ago :)
>>
>>     It's nice, but it doesn't look too great. Maybe the next big
>>     UI/UX project :)
>>
>>     > Other topic:
>>     > I signed up for a small payed freelance job. Deadline is 24.4.
>>     Until that date
>>     > I'm not sure if I can continue working on IPFire. After that
>>     date I'll of
>>     > course continue :)
>>
>>     No worries. Work comes first of course.
>>
>>     Are the Captive Portal styleguides somewhere? So I can keep
>>     pushing on that.
>>
>>     And I am sure that there is enough stuff available for Sven to
>>     start working on
>>     the Features page.
>>
>>     -Michael
>>
>>     >
>>     > Best,
>>     > Maurice
>>     >
>>     > Am 11.04.2017 4:27 nachm. schrieb "Michael Tremer"
>>     <michael.tremer at ipfire.org <mailto:michael.tremer at ipfire.org>>
>>     > :
>>     > > Regarding the updated content: I am going to sit down with
>>     Daniel as soon as
>>     > > we
>>     > > can. It's Easter now, so maybe we get something done this
>>     weekend or the
>>     > > week
>>     > > after.
>>     > >
>>     > > I mainly want to focus on the texts and working. Maybe make
>>     them a little
>>     > > bit
>>     > > shorter and more to the point, but I generally do not plan to
>>     change
>>     > > anything
>>     > > that is big enough to change the layout, too. If we do need
>>     some changes I
>>     > > won't
>>     > > hesitate to ask, but it is all rather minor stuff that I do
>>     have in mind so
>>     > > far.
>>     > >
>>     > > Regarding the bug tracker:
>>     > >
>>     > > The category exists already under "Infrastructure".
>>     > >
>>     > > I created a new umbrella bug which should be used to make
>>     other bugs depend
>>     > > on
>>     > > it. That allows us to always have a list of things that need
>>     to be dealt
>>     > > with at
>>     > > a glance:
>>     > >
>>     > > https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11314
>>     <https://bugzilla.ipfire.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11314>
>>     > >
>>     > > Just create new reports in the same category and type in
>>     11314 into the
>>     > > "Depends
>>     > > on" field.
>>     > >
>>     > > Bugzilla seems a big ugly and scary in the beginning but it
>>     is really
>>     > > powerful
>>     > > :) So give it a chance.
>>     > >
>>     > > Best,
>>     > > -Michael
>>     > >
>>     > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 14:58 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
>>     > > > Regarding the icons: I would like to use the material
>>     design icon rules.
>>     > > With
>>     > > > rules I mean the guidelines to create those icons. E.g. 2px
>>     stroke
>>     > > strength.
>>     > > > Reason: it's easy to create custom icons with these rules
>>     and the keep a
>>     > > > consistent look. We will need a lot of icons for the WUI.
>>     > > >
>>     > > > Am 11.04.2017 2:47 nachm. schrieb "Sven"
>>     <sven.hoehn at posteo.de <mailto:sven.hoehn at posteo.de>>:
>>     > > > > > On 11. Apr 2017, at 14:43, Maurice Gesswein
>>     <zerpixelung at gmail.com <mailto:zerpixelung at gmail.com>>
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > Hi all,
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > I agree. Good job so far Sven. Thanks.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > I see couple of more minor bugs I would like to fix.
>>     Can we please
>>     > > create
>>     > > > > > a to-do list which can be edit and tracked by all
>>     involved people?
>>     > > > > > Michael, can you set up something?
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > If Michael can add a new category for the website in the
>>     ipfire
>>     > > bugtracker,
>>     > > > > than we can add the issues there.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > > At the moment I design some key viewports for the
>>     features page and
>>     > > the
>>     > > > > > captive portal in parallel.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > Michael, if you want to implement new copies, images
>>     etc. let me know
>>     > > and
>>     > > > > > I can design an additional or replacement for a section
>>     of the
>>     > > homepage.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > Best,
>>     > > > > > Maurice
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > Am 11.04.2017 12:26 nachm. schrieb "Michael Tremer"
>>     <michael.tremer at ip
>>     > > fire
>>     > > > > > .org>:
>>     > > > > > > Hi,
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > so finally I took the time and had a close look at
>>     the current
>>     > > version
>>     > > > > > > of the
>>     > > > > > > website and I really really really like it so far.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > For me it mainly has some sort of soul. The old
>>     website was just
>>     > > blank
>>     > > > > > > and
>>     > > > > > > didn't really present things very well. It just
>>     delivered the plain
>>     > > > > > > content.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > Very well done guys.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > But this is only the start :) There is more ahead and
>>     I am really
>>     > > > > > > looking
>>     > > > > > > forward to present everything to our community soon!
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > ----
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > What I at the moment don't get from the website when
>>     I open it is
>>     > > that
>>     > > > > > > this is
>>     > > > > > > saying "firewall" in any sense. I don't mean just the
>>     word but
>>     > > visually
>>     > > > > > > stating
>>     > > > > > > this anywhere.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > It is not a big issue for me but at least in the
>>     block below we have
>>     > > to
>>     > > > > > > make
>>     > > > > > > this clearer what IPFire actually is. This doesn't
>>     have much to do
>>     > > with
>>     > > > > > > the
>>     > > > > > > design. This is just content.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > After a general introduction the reader gets to the
>>     latest news!
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > And then how to support the project and contribute
>>     (at least
>>     > > financially
>>     > > > > > > here).
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > Good flow.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > ----
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > Overall I could not find any issues with the
>>     implementation so far.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > The mobile views look good. Most of the stuff that I
>>     do not like is
>>     > > > > > > content. We
>>     > > > > > > have to update this a bit.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > One thing is that the arrow at the bottom of the page
>>     that scrolls
>>     > > it
>>     > > > > > > down
>>     > > > > > > becomes invisible when hovering over it. Maybe it
>>     should become
>>     > > white
>>     > > > > > > when the
>>     > > > > > > background changes to red?
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > And in the Wishlist section there is a line that says
>>     "86% funded"
>>     > > over
>>     > > > > > > the
>>     > > > > > > headline of the crowd funding name. This is a
>>     slightly lighter grey
>>     > > than
>>     > > > > > > the
>>     > > > > > > background and practically invisible.
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > The link to the "Features" page is wrong on the top
>>     view. It points
>>     > > to:
>>     > > > > > > http://d
>>     > > > > > > ev.ipfire.org/featues <http://ev.ipfire.org/featues>
>>     (an r is missing).
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > ----
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > Regarding code:
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > The CSS seems to be quite small (I like that a lot).
>>     However, how
>>     > > would
>>     > > > > > > that get
>>     > > > > > > translated from SCSS to CSS? Could you modify the
>>     Makefile so that
>>     > > this
>>     > > > > > > is done
>>     > > > > > > automatically when ever something has changed or so?
>>     I am not even
>>     > > sure
>>     > > > > > > what
>>     > > > > > > tools are required to build the CSS. Can we document
>>     that somehwere,
>>     > > > > > > too?
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > Small CSS? It has 5385 lines at the moment, is not that
>>     small :-) But in
>>     > > the
>>     > > > > live version I will compress the code.
>>     > > > > For the CSS compilation I use a program called Codekit
>>     that complies the
>>     > > CSS
>>     > > > > every time I save the document.
>>     > > > > But I will look for something that can do that step on
>>     the server.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > > > We need to do a spring clean then. Will we continue
>>     to use Font
>>     > > Awesome
>>     > > > > > > icons or
>>     > > > > > > the glyphicons? If not, bin them.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > Only the icons made by Maurice as svg. No Font Awesome or
>>     glyphicons.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > > > ----
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > So I think we are very close to consider the
>>     frontpage done. What
>>     > > are
>>     > > > > > > the next
>>     > > > > > > steps?
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > -Michael
>>     > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 07:09 +0200, Sven wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > Hello,
>>     > > > > > > > I updated the icons on the site.
>>     > > > > > > > What else is wrong or to change?
>>     > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > On 9. Apr 2017, at 14:40, Maurice Gesswein
>>     <zerpixelung at gmail.co <mailto:zerpixelung at gmail.co>
>>     > > m>
>>     > > > > > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > Sorry for the delay. I fixed the slice area for
>>     the icons. Sven,
>>     > > > > > > please
>>     > > > > > > > > export all of those again. All of them have now a
>>     square size.
>>     > > > > > > Source pixel-
>>     > > > > > > > > size is 24x24px.
>>     > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Sven
>>     <sven.hoehn at posteo.de <mailto:sven.hoehn at posteo.de>>
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > there are some strange bugs with flex and
>>     webkit. I’m not sure
>>     > > if
>>     > > > > > > they
>>     > > > > > > > > > come from Bootstrap or are real bugs in Webkit,
>>     but I think
>>     > > that I
>>     > > > > > > can
>>     > > > > > > > > > workaround them.
>>     > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > On 7. Apr 2017, at 12:01, Michael Tremer
>>     <michael.tremer at ipf
>>     > > ire.
>>     > > > > > > org>
>>     > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > I just updated the dev site.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > I will run a job that does this automatically
>>     once an hour
>>     > > from
>>     > > > > > > now on.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > Icons won't load at the moment... :(
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > -Michael
>>     > > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 08:11 +0200, Maurice
>>     Gesswein wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> Am 06.04.2017 10:52 nachm. schrieb "Sven"
>>     <sven.hoehn at poste
>>     > > o.de <http://o.de>
>>     > > > > > > >:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> @Michael can you please update the files for
>>     the dev
>>     > > website
>>     > > > > > > with the
>>     > > > > > > > > > new
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> commit?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> I correct a part of the errors written down
>>     by Maurice.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> Also edit the icons but now I have complete
>>     control with
>>     > > CSS
>>     > > > > > > but the
>>     > > > > > > > > > sizes are
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> not right, have to check the SVG code for
>>     that. (https://fv
>>     > > sch.
>>     > > > > > > com/code
>>     > > > > > > > > > /svg-ic
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> ons/how-to/)
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> Seems to be that I was not clear enough,
>>     sorry. I provided
>>     > > the
>>     > > > > > > icons in
>>     > > > > > > > > > a
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> wrong way. I'll send corrected icons at
>>     24x24 this evening.
>>     > > > > > > Just scale
>>     > > > > > > > > > the
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> existing icons to a square will not work as
>>     expected. The
>>     > > > > > > optical
>>     > > > > > > > > > proportions
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> will be lost. Feel free to compare them with
>>     the existing
>>     > > ones
>>     > > > > > > and you
>>     > > > > > > > > > will
>>     > > > > > > > > > >> see the difference.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> On 6. Apr 2017, at 15:19, Sven
>>     <sven.hoehn at posteo.de <mailto:sven.hoehn at posteo.de>>
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> On 6. Apr 2017, at 14:19, Michael Tremer
>>     <michael.tremer@
>>     > > ipfi
>>     > > > > > > re.org <http://re.org>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> First of all loads of thanks to you two
>>     for working on
>>     > > this.
>>     > > > > > > This is
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> really
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> coming along looking awesome.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> How do we fix the "visual bugs" now?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> Good question,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> I am not really on the same page with what
>>     should be
>>     > > finished
>>     > > > > > > now and
>>     > > > > > > > > > what
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> not.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> Many pages look broken and I assume you
>>     just have not
>>     > > been
>>     > > > > > > working on
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> these, yet
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> :)
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> I didn’t look at any other page except the
>>     homepage and to
>>     > > me
>>     > > > > > > it’s not
>>     > > > > > > > > > clear
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> which page get a complete new layout and
>>     which page get
>>     > > only
>>     > > > > > > the
>>     > > > > > > > > > “style-
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> update”.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> And I have some smaller things that don't
>>     seem to look
>>     > > right
>>     > > > > > > in
>>     > > > > > > > > > Firefox.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> Is this
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> the right time to collect these, yet?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> Yes. But let us open a ticket on the bug
>>     tracker for the
>>     > > > > > > webpage.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> I think that some of the things that don’t
>>     look right to
>>     > > you
>>     > > > > > > are the
>>     > > > > > > > > > same
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> for Maurice.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> @Michael can you create the ticket? I’m not
>>     sure in which
>>     > > > > > > category it
>>     > > > > > > > > > goes.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> -Michael
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 23:02 +0200, Maurice
>>     Gesswein
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> First output looks very promising for me.
>>     Thanks Sven!
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> It seems to be that something went weird
>>     with the colors
>>     > > at
>>     > > > > > > Zeplin.
>>     > > > > > > > > > At
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> thumbnails they look good, when you open
>>     a screen they
>>     > > > > > > doesn't. Good
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> news: Hex
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> codes are correct! :) I'll figure out
>>     what went wrong
>>     > > and
>>     > > > > > > perhaps I
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> found
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> another tool like Zeplin which can be
>>     archived by
>>     > > Michael ;p
>>     > > > > > > Stay
>>     > > > > > > > > > tuned,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> still
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> checking the feature set.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Next thing is that Zeplin interprets the
>>     properties of
>>     > > e.g.
>>     > > > > > > a font
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> correct but
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> might be unclear for others. Please use
>>     the properties
>>     > > ABOVE
>>     > > > > > > the CSS
>>     > > > > > > > > > box
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> as
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the primary information about the
>>     selected element. Than
>>     > > > > > > your
>>     > > > > > > > > > mentioned
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> opacity issue should be clear. The colors
>>     should look
>>     > > like
>>     > > > > > > this:
>>     > > > > > > > > > rgba(0,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> 0, 0,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> 0.6).
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I found several things I would like to fix:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I noticed that I have to build up the
>>     Sketch file in a
>>     > > > > > > different way
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> that
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> icons will be exported correct as 24x24px
>>     size. At the
>>     > > > > > > moment they
>>     > > > > > > > > > are
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> cropped. At their proper size of 24x24px
>>     it will be a
>>     > > lot
>>     > > > > > > easier to
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> align
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> those vertically correct. I'll update the
>>     Icon screen
>>     > > asap.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Please recheck all opacity values. A lot
>>     of them are not
>>     > > > > > > correct. I
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> guess
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> that's due to the CSS output of Zeplin
>>     and how I set up
>>     > > the
>>     > > > > > > Sketch
>>     > > > > > > > > > file.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Use
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> the values which are shown above the CSS box.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Please also recheck the line-heights of
>>     each font-style.
>>     > > > > > > Some of
>>     > > > > > > > > > them
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> has
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> strange values.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Font weight on buttons should be medium/600.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Ghost buttons doesn't have dropshadows
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Lots of elements become smaller at <992px
>>     width. That
>>     > > should
>>     > > > > > > not
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> happens.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> It seems to be that the gaps of the grid
>>     were not set to
>>     > > > > > > 24px
>>     > > > > > > > > > instead of
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> 30px.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Aren't they? If this would cause too much
>>     trouble, we
>>     > > can
>>     > > > > > > leave it
>>     > > > > > > > > > as it
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> is.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> It doesn't have a bad impact.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> "Fire" of IPFire in the top navigation is not
>>     > > bold/medium
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> The buttons has lots of different
>>     heights. Please set a
>>     > > > > > > fixed height
>>     > > > > > > > > > of
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> 36 for
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> default buttons and 48px for big buttons
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> The touch target area is missing at the
>>     default buttons
>>     > > > > > > (48px
>>     > > > > > > > > > height).
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> That's
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> important to provide a good user
>>     experience at touch
>>     > > > > > > devices. The
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> clickable
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> area must be big enough that fat finger
>>     hits it the
>>     > > first
>>     > > > > > > time ;)
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> At viewport <992px the burger icon is not
>>     left aligned
>>     > > > > > > anymore. But
>>     > > > > > > > > > you
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> already said that you doesn't spend much
>>     time at the
>>     > > > > > > navigation so
>>     > > > > > > > > > far.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Some more minor issues... But for now it
>>     should be
>>     > > enough to
>>     > > > > > > fix :)
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Do we want to set up a Trello board for
>>     all these and
>>     > > > > > > upcoming
>>     > > > > > > > > > todos?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm also
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> fine by using Git issues for that.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Best,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Maurice
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Sven
>>     <sven.hoehn at posteo.
>>     > > de>
>>     > > > > > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> and now how we proceed?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Are you writing down a list with all the
>>     things to
>>     > > change?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Do we talk so that everybody express
>>     what he thinks and
>>     > > > > > > what to
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> change?
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 5. Apr 2017, at 19:55, Michael
>>     Tremer <michael.trem
>>     > > er at i
>>     > > > > > > pfire.or
>>     > > > > > > > > > g>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it is all up on http://dev.ipfire.org
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> If you want to view fireinfo, just add
>>     the "dev" to
>>     > > the
>>     > > > > > > domain.
>>     > > > > > > > > > For
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> example:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> http://fireinfo.dev.ipfire.org
>>     <http://fireinfo.dev.ipfire.org>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Do the same for planet, wishlist, etc...
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> -Michael
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 18:11 +0100,
>>     Michael Tremer
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 22:18 +0200,
>>     Sven wrote:
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I’m thinkin’ that the coding of the
>>     home page has
>>     > > > > > > reached a
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> point where
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> we
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> need the site live to discuss.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Great!
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> It’s not pixel perfect, the mobile
>>     menu is only the
>>     > > > > > > bootstrap
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> version
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> from
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> top
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> down and not from the left like in
>>     the mookups, the
>>     > > SCSS
>>     > > > > > > code is
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> still
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> very
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> chaotic, the image-scaling dosen’t
>>     work like
>>     > > expected
>>     > > > > > > and the
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> svg
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> scaling
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> dosen’t work at all in Safari, but
>>     it’s good enough
>>     > > to
>>     > > > > > > have a
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> conversation.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> @Michael it is possible to include
>>     html markup
>>     > > between
>>     > > > > > > these
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> brackets {{
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> _("IPFire") }} for example {{
>>     > > > > > > _(“IP<strong>Fire</strong>") }}
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> No. The translation function escapes
>>     all HTML.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> @Maurice I have troubles with the
>>     colours, in zeplin
>>     > > for
>>     > > > > > > example
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> background is $blue_grey_900 but with
>>     a opacity of
>>     > > 0.6
>>     > > > > > > when I
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> put the
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> same
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> values in my css the colour seems darker.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> But its easier to go all of these
>>     details when you
>>     > > see
>>     > > > > > > it in
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> your
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> browser.
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sven
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -Michael
>>     > > > > > > > > > >>
>>     > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > >
>>     > > > > > > >
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > >
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ipfire.org/pipermail/ipfire-artwork/attachments/20170623/d4058338/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the IPFire-Artwork mailing list