First, Michael, thank you for the excellent article. It was longer than normal, but well worth the read. I now understand why the ARM stuff is such a pain in the rear.
Some of the articles are definitely transient (ie, new release, stuff like that), but articles like this are not. I was wondering if there is a need to place that article (and possibly others like it) in the documentation site. Under a special section?
Rod
Hey Rod,
great to hear from you and thanks for the nice words about the article.
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:11 -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
First, Michael, thank you for the excellent article. It was longer than normal, but well worth the read. I now understand why the ARM stuff is such a pain in the rear.
I hope that comes across. It was you who started all that ARM stuff and I am still very happy that we worked on it and that we made such a huge progress so far, but facing these problems, there will be an end of these good days.
Some of the articles are definitely transient (ie, new release, stuff like that), but articles like this are not. I was wondering if there is a need to place that article (and possibly others like it) in the documentation site. Under a special section?
May be it's a good idea to start a section and reference to the article on the planet. But I thought it was a good idea writing this on the planet, because the information on the planet ages a lot. In a year, the situation about the ARM hardware could be completely different and we usually are not able to keep the wiki as up to date as it should be.
Hope the language was okay :)
-Michael
Rod _______________________________________________ Documentation mailing list Documentation@lists.ipfire.org http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/documentation
documentation@lists.ipfire.org
-
Michael Tremer -
R. W. Rodolico