Hi folks
During my discussion with Michael in the zabbix_agentd patchset thread
about knowing what addon services should be running or not, it came up
that it would be handy for several reasons if we had a bit more metadata
for pak-files as we currently have. Mostly knowing which services
(initscripts) are installed by a pak-file.
This would allow for services.cgi to not have to manually try to find
out if an installed addon actually has an initscript or not.
Also paks like libvirt install 2 initscripts, those can now both be
displayed on the services.cgi page.
Idem for monitoring agents, which was my main objective.
So here is an attempt to achieve this. This is not yet a patchset to
be applied yet, but rather a proposal as this change would require all
addon LFS-files to be changed. But I didn't want to do that yet as
this patchset may very wel be rejected completely :-).
The first patch introduces 2 new macro's:
- SUMMARY for a short, one-line summary of the package
- INITSCRIPTS for a space seperated list of initscripts provided by the
package.
And an alternative INSTALL_INITSCRIPTS method instead of the current
INSTALL_INITSCRIPT method. As we now have all initscripts in the
INITSCRIPTS macro, the INSTALL_INITSCRIPTS will install all initscripts
listed in that macro, so a simple call to INSTALL_INITSCRIPTS will now
do the job instead of multiple calls in case of multiple initscripts
(for example libvirt. I noticed clamav actually uses 1 initscript for
starting 2 services, this could maybe also be split up again)
I included 2 examples in the first patch: libvirt and zabbix_agentd. But
when implemented ofcourse all makefiles should be updated.
During the pak packaging process in the build procedure, those new
macro's will be inheritted in the generated pakfire meta-* files.
The second patch adds an extra 'info <pak(s)>' commandline parameter to
pakfire, which will in turn call a new Pakfire::pakinfo function.
This function wil parse the meta-* file of the requested pak and
functions in 2 modes:
- "latest" which is the behaviour of the info parameter. This will
display the latest available metadata of the pak and the status of
the pak on the system as in: is it installed?, and if so, is it
up-to-date.
- "installed" wich will display only information about the currently
installed pak and bail out of the requested pak is not currently
installed.
This function was added to provide a 'central' point/method to get pak
information. I don't know if there are other scripts beside services.cgi
that currently try parsing meta-* files. But they should then be changed
to use this function instead.
Example output of the new pakfire info command: `pakfire info zabbix_agentd`:
when installed and up-to-date:
---
Name: zabbix_agentd
Version: 4.2.6-4
Summary: Zabbix Agent
Size: 250.00 KB
Dependencies:
Pakfile: zabbix_agentd-4.2.6-4.ipfire
InitScripts: zabbix_agentd
Installed: Yes
Status: up-to-date
---
When an update is available:
---
Name: zabbix_agentd
Version: 5.0.10-5
Summary: Zabbix Agent
Size: 276.00 KB
Dependencies: fping
Pakfile: zabbix_agentd-5.0.10-5.ipfire
InitScripts: zabbix_agentd
Installed: Yes
Status: outdated (version 4.2.6-4 is installed)
---
Or when a pak was discontinued and no longer supplied by ipfire, but
still installed on the system:
---
Name: zabbix_agentd
Version: -
Summary: Zabbix Agent
Size: 250.00 KB
Dependencies:
Pakfile: zabbix_agentd-4.2.6-4.ipfire
InitScripts: zabbix_agentd
Installed: Yes
Status: obsolete (version 4.2.6-4 is installed)
---
and at last when a pak is available, but not installed:
---
Name: zabbix_agentd
Version: 5.0.10-5
Summary: Zabbix Agent
Size: 276.00 KB
Dependencies: fping
Pakfile: zabbix_agentd-5.0.10-5.ipfire
InitScripts: zabbix_agentd
Installed: No
Status: not installed
---
And then the last patch is an update of service.cgi now using the new
Pakfire::pakinfo function in "installed"-mode.
If there are any suggestions on more metadata.. I think this is the
moment to throw them at me.
And ofcourse suggestions/comments are welcome as this is currently only
a proposal for change. But I think we win in robustness of services.cgi
and user experience in both using pakfire and ability to provide
available services to monitoring agents.
On top of that could the whole meta-* files system be overhauled in the
future, if wanted, with only pakfire itself needing change as the rest
will then depend on pakfire for correctly parsing it's "database".
Regards
Robin
--
Dit bericht is gescanned op virussen en andere gevaarlijke
inhoud door MailScanner en lijkt schoon te zijn.