28 Jan
2013
28 Jan
'13
1:11 p.m.
In case this should be shipped with IPFire 2.13, this has to me fully merged by today!
We are just finished with all the things, that we had to do for RC1, which is about to be released this week. After that, we cannot take any changes that are anything else than bug fixes.
Michael
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 12:21 +0100, Jörn-Ingo Weigert wrote:
Any update on this for merging or test results / bugs?
Kind regards,
nightshift
2013/1/9 Jörn-Ingo Weigert jiweigert@gmail.com That would be nice when it could be integrated in a 2.11 Core66 ;) Before that it will be great when the developers could check their UI-Addon-Interfaces.
Before the my patches all browsers where regardless of the used DOCTYPE in a quirks-mode of xhtml. So with these patches the xhtml-strict now really get into work, with the side-effect that maybe some Addon-pages are not well working as designed (maybe links not clickable, etc). These errors are mostly caused by misplacing Tags, UPPERCASE-type of it or using depricated or misused attributes or Tags like <FONT> which are really depricated in XHTML 1.0. Those kind of errors are easy to find with the W3C-Validator and more easy to fix. For the ui of updxl I just needed 1 hour to find and fix those general errors, and a "little" bit more (a lie but sound good ;) ) to optimise it for an more CSS-based layout. If the general errors are fixed that would be enough. Did anyone test it and have some results if the changes I made work or work not on their machines or have any degressions elsewhere? Kind regards, nightshift 2013/1/5 Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org> Hello, thank you very much for the patches you sent in. I had a look at them and they look fine (did not read through all the perl code). Patches 0005 is a duplicate of 0004. Who is now going to merge them to the git repository? I am running out of time to do that. I reckon the changes won't make it to IPFire 2.13, which is done by now. Michael On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:24 +0100, Jörn-Ingo Weigert wrote: > Hi Michael, > > 2012/12/23 Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org> > Hi Jörn, > > could you please provide patch files against the current > development > tree, so we can review the changes you made more easily. > > Done, I'm not so familar with git and RCS in general, so take it easy > and the files attached. > don't know if git added the extra giffiles so added it too. put them > into html/html/images/updbooster dir. > > Well, the WUI is not conform to any HTML standard, because too > many > people have put their code into it without agreeing on a > coding style. > > Well, I oriented me on the existing XHTML-Doctype in the current > header. > > > I personally consider this as a full-time job to fix all > problem that > there are and so, I don't want to put more time than necessary > into it. > Developing a new WUI from scratch is more important to me. > > > I agree with you, but hoping that coming versions of browsers will be > lazy as now in interpreting > not correct formed (x)html should not the right way. Better to point > to the browser vendors then on our own code. ;) > And its not much work (Hust) to test it with online validators. > > > 1. apache: > > > Modified /etc/httpd/conf/loadmodules.conf - enable > mod_deflate for > > compression the output files (except graphics) if browser > supports it. > > Modified /etc/httpd/conf/vhosts.d/ipfire-interface-ssl.conf > - enabling > > compression for whole SSL-Web interface > > > Yeah, we can accept that one. Please send the patch. > > Great :) > > > > 2. Theme "ipfire" & "maniac": > > > > .... > > > > These changes let perform google chrome like a charm > rendering the > > pages within ~15 secs like other browsers (tested with IE9, > Opera, > > Firefox in actual versions) > > instead of waiting for minutes ... > > > In case that does not break anything with older browsers, send > a patch > as well. > > > I didn't test it with IE <=7, or NNavigator nor MOSAIC ... well let's > see. > > > 3. Web-UI in general and addons which use the "age"-function > from > > general-functions > > > > > > - modified age function to show the time translated, in > single and > > plural terms, but only the parts, which make sense. > > Example instead of showing: 0d 0h 47m 15s, it will show > now: 47 > > Minutes, 15sec. in connection time > > > I don't think that it makes any sense to print "minutes" > instead of "m" > because there is not enough space to do so. > > I agree that it makes sense to omit "0d" and "0h". > > > Well, it prints out only the first part in long form, all followed > will be shortened > > Examples > > Old: 1d 2h 3m 4s > New: 1 Day, 2 Hr, 3 Min, 4 Sec > > Old: 0d 0h 1m 2s > New: 1 Minute, 2 Sec. > > > > Yes there is, because those files have been changed recently. > > I see. > > -Michael > > Hope, this work now.. > > Kind regards, > > nightshift > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@lists.ipfire.org > http://lists.ipfire.org/mailman/listinfo/development