On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:59 +0200, Larsen wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 12:53:08 +0200, Michael Tremer michael.tremer@ipfire.org wrote:
Is there a certain reason why this is done by using Javascript? An <a> tag would have worked fine as well I think. That would require to embed the image by using the <img> tag, but that is probably the cleaner solution any way...
I used this as a starting point: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4465923/a-href-link-for-entire-div-in-htm...
The <a>-tag didn´t work when I wrapped it around the <div>-tag (and it would only be allowed for HTML5). I didn´t think about using an <img>-tag as I thought that it was cleaner as it is by using CSS.
I do know that some have JS deactivated and don´t like it, but in this case there is nothing lost.
If someone disables JS they will already have issues with other parts of the web user interface and of course most of the "web 2.0".
Is there anything else wrong with using JS?
Not in general. I just find it a rather complex solution for a simple problem. The plain HTML approach would be much better and work for those who disable JS, too.
-Michael
Lars