Hello Jon,
thanks for your reply.
Peter / Michael,
- It is not entirely error-proof (out of disk space, out of memory, system being rebooted too early)
Is it possible to add a Disk Space check before doing an upgrade?
Um, I thought we do that in the update.sh of every Core Update that involves a kernel update?
I’ve been bit twice by running out of disk space mid-upgrade. I was remotely upgrading a family member's system from CU 163 to CU 167 and got stuck ½ way.
When multiple Core Updates are available, Pakfire will currently download them all before applying them sequentially. On systems with very tight disk space, this can indeed cause trouble, since the more Core Updates they lag behind, the greater is the amount of disk space necessary for upgrading.
I guess it makes sense to raise this issue and the general question whether we should ship initial ramdisks or generate them on the target systems (the former has quite some impact on Core Update sizes) in the August telephone conference.
Any thoughts?
Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller
Here is my recent oops:
Message from syslogd@ipfire4 at Fri May 13 14:59:33 2022 ... ipfire4 ipfire: core-update-164: ERROR cannot update because not enough free space on root. May 13 14:59:33 ipfire4 pakfire: PAKFIRE ERROR: Returncode: 2. Sorry. Please search our forum to find a solution for this problem. May 13 14:59:55 ipfire4 sshd[31097]: Received signal 15; terminating.Jon
On Jul 7, 2022, at 8:19 AM, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer@ipfire.org mailto:michael.tremer@ipfire.org> wrote:
Hello,
Indeed we don’t need to ship them, we can generate them instead.
But that has of course some downsides, too:
- It is slow
- It is not entirely error-proof (out of disk space, out of memory, system being rebooted too early)
I do not really have much of a preference. The only thing I want to say is that ARM needs to get their shit together and being able to load a regular image instead of asking for extra commands here - or build that into dracut.
-Michael
On 7 Jul 2022, at 07:48, Peter Müller <peter.mueller@ipfire.org mailto:peter.mueller@ipfire.org> wrote:
Hello *,
to my understanding, we do not need to ship "linux-initrd" if we can easily rebuild those on the systems anyway. I would prefer the latter, since that keeps the update smaller.
This was also raised somewhere in the community a while ago, but I am unable to find the correspondent thread at the moment.
How do we proceed here?
Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller
https://community.ipfire.org/t/again-with-the-file-system-full-core-169/8186 https://community.ipfire.org/t/again-with-the-file-system-full-core-169/8186
Signed-off-by: Peter Müller peter.mueller@ipfire.org
config/rootfiles/core/169/update.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/config/rootfiles/core/169/update.sh b/config/rootfiles/core/169/update.sh index 3902e2d45..50f0bd8a4 100644 --- a/config/rootfiles/core/169/update.sh +++ b/config/rootfiles/core/169/update.sh @@ -150,6 +150,19 @@ ldconfig # Apply sysctl changes /etc/init.d/sysctl start
+# Regenerate all initrds +dracut --regenerate-all --force +case "$(uname -m)" in
- armv*)
mkimage -A arm -T ramdisk -C lzma -d /boot/initramfs-${KVER}-ipfire.img /boot/uInit-${KVER}-ipfirerm /boot/initramfs-${KVER}-ipfire.img;;- aarch64)
mkimage -A arm64 -T ramdisk -C lzma -d /boot/initramfs-${KVER}-ipfire.img /boot/uInit-${KVER}-ipfire# dont remove initramfs because grub need this to boot.;;+esac
# Start services telinit u /etc/init.d/firewall restart