Hi,
On 08.04.2016 21:03, Michael Tremer wrote:
Are you sure we have the requirements switched on in our kernel?
No, I'm definitely NOT sure! I'm not so deep into the current kernel options to make a secure statement about this.
Furthermore, since I'm at work again (holidays are over, *sigh*), I hadn't the time to test this more extensive. I had to put it on my long term ToDo-list. The last build - without 'ebtables' - was built without errors, but I didn't test it ONLINE yet! Right now I have the feeling this will require a lot of adjustments to get it really running. For now, the best will be to stay on the current release.
Best, Matthias
-Michael
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 17:06 +0200, Matthias Fischer wrote:
Hi,
On 01.04.2016 08:21, Matthias Fischer wrote:
Maybe we should stay on the last release?!
For now, I'd say 'Yes'! I'll take a closer look at it!
For the records: Right now I'm running a testbuild, based on 'next', with 'iptables 1.6.0' but *without* 'ebtables'. We'll see.
Best, Matthias