While I am only an Ipfire user, I like to follow this list to keep up with its development. In that light, I am curious: why is Selinux support being dropped from some of the GNU utilities? Especially since Selinux is one of the best security tools in Linux.
Won't removal of Selinux support weaken security in Ipfire?
On Oct 29, 2016 6:47 AM, "Stefan Schantl" stefan.schantl@ipfire.org wrote:
Fixes #11211.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schantl stefan.schantl@ipfire.org
libuser/libuser.nm | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libuser/libuser.nm b/libuser/libuser.nm index c0751dc..709d5ea 100644 --- a/libuser/libuser.nm +++ b/libuser/libuser.nm @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
name = libuser version = 0.62 -release = 1 +release = 2
groups = System/Libraries url = https://fedorahosted.org/libuser/ @@ -25,23 +25,30 @@ build requires cyrus-sasl-devel glib2-devel
libselinux-devel openldap-devel pam-devel pkg-config popt-devel
python-devel
python-devel >= 2.7.12-2 end
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH = %{DIR_APP}/lib/.libs
configure_options += \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--with-ldap \
--with-selinux
--with-ldap prepare_cmds # Little hack that we don't build documentation that
requires sgml2html sed -e "s/^SUBDIRS = .*/SUBDIRS = po/" -i Makefile.in end
test
# Disable tests which requires a running ldap server.
sed -e "s/tests\/default_pw_test//" -i Makefile
sed -e "s/tests\/ldap_test//" -i Makefile
make check
end
end
packages
2.7.4