BUG 10262

Dear List.

I confirmed Bug #10262. The webinterface is programmed inconsistently. Under the OPENVPN advanced options, the field "domain" is checked via &General::validfqdnname which checks, if the domainname has two parts, seperated by a dot.

under the DHCP options, the "domain" field is written into the CONF File without any checks.

Which of the developers is responsible for the DHCP code?

AND: What is the GENERAL policy for a domain name?

Should there be just a name (which also needs to be checked) or do we need to have a dot-sperarated domain name?

I don't know what is the RFC for this, but i think it should be in DNS compatible form "domain.toplevel".

Any thoughts?

Alex