Location May 2022

location@lists.ipfire.org

2 participants
1 discussions

Fwd: [db-wg] Recognisition of Kosovo and adding of LIR signup options with Kosovo as well as XK in inet(6)num
by Peter Müller 17 May '22

17 May '22

Hello *, just wanted to bring this one to your attention - please also refer to the follow-up messages, if interested/necessary. I genuinely dislike the idea of having X* country codes in a RIR database as well, in addition to their usual mess we need to cope with. The geofeed approach is by no means a promising alternative to me. :-( Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [db-wg] Recognisition of Kosovo and adding of LIR signup options with Kosovo as well as XK in inet(6)num Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 02:10:22 +0200 From: William Weber via db-wg <db-wg(a)ripe.net> Reply To: William Weber <william(a)inbox.li> To: db-wg(a)ripe.net Hi, As the Netherlands recognise the Republic of Kosovo as sovereign nation (see 1), and the EU does as well (see 2) there should be a way to include the proposed 2 letter country code (XK, see 3) as option for inet(6)num objects. The EU and other multinational organisation (IMF, SWIFT etc., see 4) use this code already since independence in 2008, and it is the currently reserved ccTLD for Kosovo as well. Kosovo also has a unique phone number prefix assigned (+383) by the ITU (see 5). It makes no sense that EU and AP is available (which are not countries, AP is not even in ISO-3166-2), but XK is not. I am aware the the X* series of codes is reserved and not permanently assigned, however UN Security Council resolution 1244/99 (see 6) mandates the use binding to all UN members. Please let me know how to bring in a draft resolution to adopt the ability to use Kosovo as legitimate country option in RIPE database objects, as well as the LIR sign up. It is the ONLY country that is recognised by both the Netherlands and the EU that cannot be used to sign up as a LIR and my client - a Telecoms company in Pristina that wants to stay anonymous at this time to avoid issues with Serbia - feels their right is violated by having to use either Serbia or Albania as billing location, and sees uncertainty in applicable laws and taxation with this. Thank you, William Weber (LIR Portal user: william(a)william.si, multiple LIRs managed) 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20080430070042/http://www.minbuza.nl/en/news/ne… Kosovo.html 2: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/detailed-country-i… 3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2#User-assigned_code_elements 4: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary… 5: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/02/02/T02020000FD0001PDFE.pdf 6: https://www.nato.int/kosovo/docu/u990610a.htm

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Location May 2022