Hello Michael,
this is somewhat intended as I would rather keep the original AS name and "describe" more precisely what we are dealing with. On the other hand, that sounds more like "remarks"...
Not sure what to do with it then - your opinion?
Thanks, and best regards, Peter Müller
Hi,
On 9 Jun 2020, at 13:00, Peter Müller peter.mueller@ipfire.org wrote:
Partially fixes: #12421
Signed-off-by: Peter Müller peter.mueller@ipfire.org
overrides/override-other.txt | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/overrides/override-other.txt b/overrides/override-other.txt index 583bf43..2494d0c 100644 --- a/overrides/override-other.txt +++ b/overrides/override-other.txt @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ descr: Network Dedicated SAS remarks: bulletproof ISP, claims to be located in CH, but traces to NL country: NL
+aut-num: AS202425 +descr: IP Volume Inc.
Are you sure you want the field above to be called descr? That would not change the name of the AS in the database.
Just checking...
+remarks: bulletproof ISP (aka: AS29073 / Ecatel Ltd. / Quasi Networks Ltd.) located in NL +country: NL
aut-num: AS207616 descr: Altrosky Technology Ltd. remarks: fake offshore location (SC), traces back to CZ -- 2.26.2