Hi all,
I agree. Good job so far Sven. Thanks.
I see couple of more minor bugs I would like to fix. Can we please create a to-do list which can be edit and tracked by all involved people? Michael, can you set up something?
At the moment I design some key viewports for the features page and the captive portal in parallel.
Michael, if you want to implement new copies, images etc. let me know and I can design an additional or replacement for a section of the homepage.
Best, Maurice
Am 11.04.2017 12:26 nachm. schrieb "Michael Tremer" < michael.tremer@ipfire.org>:
Hi,
so finally I took the time and had a close look at the current version of the website and I really really really like it so far.
For me it mainly has some sort of soul. The old website was just blank and didn't really present things very well. It just delivered the plain content.
Very well done guys.
But this is only the start :) There is more ahead and I am really looking forward to present everything to our community soon!
What I at the moment don't get from the website when I open it is that this is saying "firewall" in any sense. I don't mean just the word but visually stating this anywhere.
It is not a big issue for me but at least in the block below we have to make this clearer what IPFire actually is. This doesn't have much to do with the design. This is just content.
After a general introduction the reader gets to the latest news!
And then how to support the project and contribute (at least financially here).
Good flow.
Overall I could not find any issues with the implementation so far.
The mobile views look good. Most of the stuff that I do not like is content. We have to update this a bit.
One thing is that the arrow at the bottom of the page that scrolls it down becomes invisible when hovering over it. Maybe it should become white when the background changes to red?
And in the Wishlist section there is a line that says "86% funded" over the headline of the crowd funding name. This is a slightly lighter grey than the background and practically invisible.
The link to the "Features" page is wrong on the top view. It points to: http://d ev.ipfire.org/featues (an r is missing).
Regarding code:
The CSS seems to be quite small (I like that a lot). However, how would that get translated from SCSS to CSS? Could you modify the Makefile so that this is done automatically when ever something has changed or so? I am not even sure what tools are required to build the CSS. Can we document that somehwere, too?
We need to do a spring clean then. Will we continue to use Font Awesome icons or the glyphicons? If not, bin them.
So I think we are very close to consider the frontpage done. What are the next steps?
-Michael
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 07:09 +0200, Sven wrote:
Hello, I updated the icons on the site. What else is wrong or to change?
On 9. Apr 2017, at 14:40, Maurice Gesswein zerpixelung@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I fixed the slice area for the icons. Sven, please export all of those again. All of them have now a square size. Source
pixel-
size is 24x24px.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Sven sven.hoehn@posteo.de wrote:
there are some strange bugs with flex and webkit. I’m not sure if
they
come from Bootstrap or are real bugs in Webkit, but I think that I
can
workaround them.
On 7. Apr 2017, at 12:01, Michael Tremer <
michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
wrote:
Hi,
I just updated the dev site.
I will run a job that does this automatically once an hour from
now on.
Icons won't load at the moment... :(
-Michael
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 08:11 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
Am 06.04.2017 10:52 nachm. schrieb "Sven" sven.hoehn@posteo.de: @Michael can you please update the files for the dev website with
the
new
commit?
I correct a part of the errors written down by Maurice. Also edit the icons but now I have complete control with CSS but
the
sizes are
not right, have to check the SVG code for that. (
/svg-ic
ons/how-to/)
Seems to be that I was not clear enough, sorry. I provided the
icons in
a
wrong way. I'll send corrected icons at 24x24 this evening. Just
scale
the
existing icons to a square will not work as expected. The optical
proportions
will be lost. Feel free to compare them with the existing ones
and you
will
see the difference.
> On 6. Apr 2017, at 15:19, Sven sven.hoehn@posteo.de wrote: > > >> On 6. Apr 2017, at 14:19, Michael Tremer <
michael.tremer@ipfire.org>
>> wrote: >> >> First of all loads of thanks to you two for working on this.
This is
>> really >> coming along looking awesome. >> >> How do we fix the "visual bugs" now? > > Good question, > >> I am not really on the same page with what should be finished
now and
what
>> not. >> Many pages look broken and I assume you just have not been
working on
>> these, yet >> :) > > I didn’t look at any other page except the homepage and to me
it’s not
clear
> which page get a complete new layout and which page get only the
“style-
> update”. > >> And I have some smaller things that don't seem to look right in
Firefox.
>> Is this >> the right time to collect these, yet? > > Yes. But let us open a ticket on the bug tracker for the webpage. > I think that some of the things that don’t look right to you are
the
same
> for Maurice. > > @Michael can you create the ticket? I’m not sure in which
category it
goes.
> Thanks. > >> -Michael >> >> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 23:02 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote: >>> First output looks very promising for me. Thanks Sven! >>> >>> It seems to be that something went weird with the colors at
Zeplin.
At
>>> the >>> thumbnails they look good, when you open a screen they
doesn't. Good
>>> news: Hex >>> codes are correct! :) I'll figure out what went wrong and
perhaps I
>>> found >>> another tool like Zeplin which can be archived by Michael ;p
Stay
tuned,
>>> still >>> checking the feature set. >>> >>> Next thing is that Zeplin interprets the properties of e.g. a
font
>>> correct but >>> might be unclear for others. Please use the properties ABOVE
the CSS
box
>>> as >>> the primary information about the selected element. Than your
mentioned
>>> opacity issue should be clear. The colors should look like
this:
rgba(0,
>>> 0, 0, >>> 0.6). >>> >>> >>> I found several things I would like to fix: >>> I noticed that I have to build up the Sketch file in a
different way
>>> that >>> icons will be exported correct as 24x24px size. At the moment
they
are
>>> cropped. At their proper size of 24x24px it will be a lot
easier to
>>> align >>> those vertically correct. I'll update the Icon screen asap. >>> Please recheck all opacity values. A lot of them are not
correct. I
>>> guess >>> that's due to the CSS output of Zeplin and how I set up the
Sketch
file.
>>> Use >>> the values which are shown above the CSS box. >>> Please also recheck the line-heights of each font-style. Some
of
them
>>> has >>> strange values. >>> Font weight on buttons should be medium/600. >>> Ghost buttons doesn't have dropshadows >>> Lots of elements become smaller at <992px width. That should
not
>>> happens. >>> It seems to be that the gaps of the grid were not set to 24px
instead of
>>> 30px. >>> Aren't they? If this would cause too much trouble, we can
leave it
as it
>>> is. >>> It doesn't have a bad impact. >>> "Fire" of IPFire in the top navigation is not bold/medium >>> The buttons has lots of different heights. Please set a fixed
height
of
>>> 36 for >>> default buttons and 48px for big buttons >>> The touch target area is missing at the default buttons (48px
height).
>>> That's >>> important to provide a good user experience at touch devices.
The
>>> clickable >>> area must be big enough that fat finger hits it the first time
;)
>>> At viewport <992px the burger icon is not left aligned
anymore. But
you
>>> already said that you doesn't spend much time at the
navigation so
far.
>>> Some more minor issues... But for now it should be enough to
fix :)
>>> >>> Do we want to set up a Trello board for all these and upcoming
todos?
>>> I'm also >>> fine by using Git issues for that. >>> >>> Best, >>> Maurice >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Sven sven.hoehn@posteo.de
wrote:
>>>> and now how we proceed? >>>> >>>> Are you writing down a list with all the things to change? >>>> >>>> Do we talk so that everybody express what he thinks and what
to
>>>> change? >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 5. Apr 2017, at 19:55, Michael Tremer
<michael.tremer@ipfire.or
g>
>>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> it is all up on http://dev.ipfire.org >>>>> >>>>> If you want to view fireinfo, just add the "dev" to the
domain.
For
>>>> example: >>>>> http://fireinfo.dev.ipfire.org >>>>> >>>>> Do the same for planet, wishlist, etc... >>>>> >>>>> -Michael >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 18:11 +0100, Michael Tremer wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 22:18 +0200, Sven wrote: >>>>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>>>> I’m thinkin’ that the coding of the home page has reached a >>>>>>> point where >>>> we >>>>>>> need the site live to discuss. >>>>>> >>>>>> Great! >>>>>> >>>>>>> It’s not pixel perfect, the mobile menu is only the
bootstrap
>>>>>>> version >>>> from >>>>>>> top >>>>>>> down and not from the left like in the mookups, the SCSS
code is
>>>>>>> still >>>> very >>>>>>> chaotic, the image-scaling dosen’t work like expected and
the
>>>>>>> svg >>>> scaling >>>>>>> dosen’t work at all in Safari, but it’s good enough to
have a
>>>> conversation. >>>>>>> @Michael it is possible to include html markup between
these
>>>>>>> brackets {{ >>>>>>> _("IPFire") }} for example {{ _(“IP<strong>Fire</strong>")
}}
>>>>>> >>>>>> No. The translation function escapes all HTML. >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Maurice I have troubles with the colours, in zeplin for
example
>>>>>>> the >>>>>>> background is $blue_grey_900 but with a opacity of 0.6
when I
>>>>>>> put the >>>> same >>>>>>> values in my css the colour seems darker. >>>>>>> But its easier to go all of these details when you see it
in
>>>>>>> your >>>> browser. >>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>> Sven >>>>>> >>>>>> -Michael