Read it later again if needed and want to recheck if the bug is fixed. This has nothing to do that I don't trust you Sven ;)
Maybe it would be good that bugs should be closed by the creator. Who fixed it should set the status to fixed. That's the way I worked with bugs since years. What do you think?
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Michael Tremer michael.tremer@ipfire.org wrote:
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 21:11 +0200, Maurice Gesswein wrote:
How can I permanently display closed bugs in bugzilla?
What do you want to do with them?
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein@ip fire.org> wrote:
I meant Ubuntu 500 if this is the medium weight. Sorry for confusion.
Am 02.05.2017 7:25 vorm. schrieb "Sven" sven.hoehn@posteo.de: For questions and feedback on the bug, where do I fill that, per eMail or on bugzilla?
I see a couple of issues at the buttons I would like to fix. I'll simply list them down.
- Touch targets (48px) at 36px buttons are missing. Thats important
for e.g. Smartphone to provide a comfortable touch zone for an element/button. Let me know if you want to learn more about that.
- The border on filled buttons falsified the left/right paddings.
Please remove the border if the button don't need it
- Please recheck the left/right paddings of ALL buttons and compare
carefully with the Pattern Lib sheet at Zeplin. Paddings are different if an icon is included.
Maybe it is easier to rewrite the buttons completely and don’t use the bootstrap buttons at all. But I will check.
- It looks like that "Ubuntu-Medium (600)" is not imported:
@import url(" https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Ubuntu:300,400,700 "); Can you replace 700 with 600 for now please? I guess I'll not use bold (700) in the designs.
There is no Ubuntu font from Google with a width of 600. Google offers only 300 (light), 400 (regular), 500 (medium) and 700 (bold).
On 1. May 2017, at 23:26, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein@ipfi re.org> wrote:
Hi. I just created my 1st bug ticket in bugzilla. Is there no edit link for the description?!
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Sven sven.hoehn@posteo.de wrote:
no problem.
On 26. Apr 2017, at 17:23, Maurice Gesswein <maurice.gesswein @ipfire.org> wrote:
Not yet, sorry. I'm pretty busy at the moment :(
Am 26.04.2017 1:47 nachm. schrieb "Sven" <sven.hoehn@posteo.d e>: > Hello. > Has someone already put a bug into the Redesign category? > Do I get a notification if someone put something in there? > > Greetings, > Sven > > > On 24. Apr 2017, at 12:11, Michael Tremer <michael.tremer > @ipfire.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 12:02 +0200, Maurice Gesswein > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm going to write some bug reports related to > dev.ipfire.org. As far as I see > >> there is no component in Bugzilla for dev.ipfire.org. > There is only a general > >> "Web Site" component. Should I use that component for my > reports and refer > >> to dev.ipfire.org? > > > > Yes, please use that one. > > > >> I also remember and see the umbrella bug "Big Website > Relaunch". I assume that > >> bugs related to dev.ipfire.org should be somehow linked > to that umbrella bug. > >> How does it work? I see nothing helpful on the "new bug" > form. Is there a > >> hidden mechanism which links a new bug reports to that > umbrella bug whenever I > >> refer to that by writing "#11314" (umbrella bug ID) in > the summary? > > > > You can just add the bug ID in the "blocks" field. That > will automatically > > connect the two bug reports. > > > > Sorry if I have not been clear about this :) Ask me if > there is anything else I > > forgot to mention. > > > > -Michael > > > >> > >> Best, > >> Maurice > >